By law, property owners and occupiers have an obligation to “exercise ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe” (see
O.C.G.A. § 51-3-1). If a property owner fails to exercise such care and a visitor later suffers damages on the premises, then the property owner may be liable to the visitor. This area of negligence law is generally referred to as premises liability, under which the claimant must show that property owner breached its duty of care by failing to equip the premises with adequate security measures.
As with other negligence claims, negligent security cases require the claimant to prove four basic elements:
This specific rule, as seen in cases like Whaley v. Tivoli Props (2011) in Fulton County State Court, illustrates the basic parts of a negligent security case in Georgia. To understand where and how negligent security claims might arise, the table below lists common property locations, security breaches, and resulting damages that may lead to liability against the property owner. If you have been the victim of a crime at any of the following locations, then you should contact an attorney to discuss your potential legal options.
Location
Security Breach
Damages
To win a negligent security case in Georgia, you have to prove that the property owner failed to take action in response to a foreseeable security risk. Foreseeability of the resulting crime is an essential part of proving your case. For example, if an apartment complex has prior notice of a string of break-ins, the law requires that the apartment complex take reasonable preventative measures to keep its residents safe. If the apartment complex fails to exercise such ordinary care in response to a known risk, then the apartment complex has breached its duty of care. This is a common type of fact pattern for negligent security cases in Georgia.
To summarize the rule of foreseeability: the claimant must present “evidence [that] is admissible to show a pattern of prior substantially similar criminal assaults on the premises creating a known dangerous condition for which the owner may be held liable” (Reid v. Augusta-Richmond Coliseum, Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992). In order to prove this element, your attorney will collect vast amounts of evidence, including witness statements, security footage (if applicable), historical property data, crime data and crime reports, medical records, and other evidentiary findings.
It is important to note that random acts of criminality, in many cases, are not enough to prove a case of negligent security. For example, if a property owner has no prior history of criminal activity on the premises, then a victim’s injury may not be foreseeable. Such an event is called an “independent, intervening criminal act” and is usually not enough to establish liability against the property owner. Still, if you’ve been the victim of a crime, you never know what information the property owner may or may not have about potential crimes; you should always be ready to consult an attorney.
When it comes to achieving justice for victims, the attorneys at The Ross Law Firm work tirelessly for their clients. When choosing an attorney for your negligent security case, make sure you select an attorney with the following qualifications:
All Rights Reserved | The Ross Law Firm